AI models are exempt from financial obligations for utilizing content, as stated by Trump.
In the final years of his presidency, Donald Trump unveiled the 2025 AI Action Plan, a comprehensive strategy aimed at making the United States a global leader in artificial intelligence (AI). The plan, comprising executive orders and related policies, has significantly influenced the development and use of AI models within the country.
The Trump Administration's approach emphasized deregulation to foster faster AI innovation and deployment, scaling down federal restrictions that might slow progress. This deregulatory approach, while not explicitly focusing on copyright law reforms, could implicitly affect how copyright is treated, potentially favouring broader data use for training AI models.
One of the key implications of the plan is the removal of barriers to AI development. By scaling down federal restrictions, the administration sought to accelerate progress in AI model training and data use. Another significant aspect is the promotion of infrastructure buildout, with policies that fast-tracked permits for data centers and semiconductor manufacturing, critical for AI model training and operation.
The plan also addressed intellectual property considerations for AI technology developed in the U.S. Policies actively supported exporting U.S. AI tools, models, hardware, and software to allied nations, encouraging wider adoption. However, this raises questions about the protection of intellectual property rights for AI technology.
Moreover, the plan included a directive to ensure federally procured AI models remain objective and free from top-down ideological biases, which could influence how AI models handle content moderation and intellectual property issues under government contracts.
During Trump's presidency, the American tech industry faced competition not only from foreign AI companies like the Chinese startup DeepSeek but also from domestic competitors such as OpenAI, Microsoft, and Nvidia. Trump's support was significant for the industry, with the American tech sector seeking regulatory relief from him in the hopes of easing or eliminating regulatory hurdles.
Trump's stance on AI and copyright laws was clear. He argued that reading a book or an article does not equate to copyright infringement, and that American AI models are not bound by copyright laws. This belief could potentially lead to tensions or changes in how existing copyright laws apply to AI, especially regarding data licensing, training on copyrighted works, and outputs generated by AI models.
In summary, Trump's AI policy advanced a strong market-driven growth agenda, with the government stepping back from heavy regulation, which could encourage rapid AI model development. However, this approach may also present challenges related to intellectual property frameworks that govern the datasets and outputs AI systems rely on. The implications of these policies continue to unfold as the AI industry evolves.
- The 2025 AI Action Plan, initiated by the Trump Administration, included a deregulatory approach that favors faster AI innovation and deployment, possibly altering how copyright is treated in future AI model development.
- The Trump Administration's policy on AI promoted infrastructure buildout, with policies intended to fast-track permits for data centers and semiconductor manufacturing, essential for AI model training and operation.
- Trump's stance on AI and copyright laws was clear as he argued against considering American AI models bound by copyright laws, potentially leading to tensions or changes in how these laws apply to AI, especially regarding data licensing, training on copyrighted works, and outputs generated by AI models.
