Latvia explores alcohol screening for drivers in car-sharing services
In a bid to combat drink-driving, particularly at night, the Latvian Ministry of Transport has proposed a new initiative that would require customers to pass a reaction test before starting a journey with car-sharing services or electric scooters. If passed, service providers who fail to administer this test could face fines ranging from €70 to €350.
However, the industry response, particularly from Bolt Drive Latvija's CEO Edvīns Kažoks, has been critical of this proposal. Kažoks argues that the decision was made without consulting the mobility industry or associations, which they view as problematic since the measure directly impacts them. He notes that a mandatory reaction test before every journey is disproportionate and would likely reduce the availability and ease of using car-sharing and e-scooter services.
Moreover, Kažoks highlights that no other EU country has implemented such a requirement, making Latvia a potential outlier if the law is passed. He also expresses concern that this rule could negatively impact the development of urban mobility by discouraging users from choosing environmentally friendly transport alternatives.
On the technical feasibility, Kažoks mentions challenges in integrating reaction tests into mobile apps. While possible in theory, practical implementation poses difficulties. The Ministry of Transport is currently working on proposals for a specific algorithm or procedure for the reaction tests, which may be submitted to the Economic Affairs Committee for consideration.
The proposed changes are primarily focused on users of electric scooters and car-sharing services, with the Ministry of Transport considering stricter forms of monitoring for these services due to issues with intoxicated drivers. The Ministry has spoken to the Mobility Association about the concerns regarding the reaction tests and will take their suggestions into account.
The amendments to the law are scheduled to enter into force on 1 April next year, but still need to be considered by the Parliament in two readings. Bolt, as a member of the Latvian Mobility Association, is consulting with other companies about the potential negative impact on urban mobility.
This proposal reflects a tension between road safety regulatory ambitions and industry concerns over practical impacts and innovation constraints. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how this new initiative will shape Latvia's urban mobility landscape.
Sports organizations might be concerned about how this proposed regulation could impact the availability and ease of using e-scooters for athletes and participants, potentially disrupting their training schedules and travel arrangements.
The European Commission, in light of this new initiative by Latvia, might consider the possible implications this regulation could have on the technological development and adaption of urban mobility solutions across various EU countries.
