Persisting Legal Issues Dog Quibi After Its Demise

Persisting Legal Issues Dog Quibi After Its Demise

Streaming Service Quibi's Legal Troubles Persist, Despite Company's Demise

Quibi, the once-promising streaming service, may have bid adieu, but its legal troubles with interactive video firm Eko continue to loom over its founders. This nemesis has haunted Quibi even before the service made its debut, all because of the controversial Turnstyle feature. This signature technology, at the heart of Quibi's entire concept, allowed for watching content seamlessly in both portrait and landscape modes. However, Eko accuses Quibi of stealing this proprietary tech, an allegation Quibi has consistently denied.

Post the recent news of Quibi's demise, Eko's unyielding stance remains crystal clear: they could not care less about Quibi's downfall. In a statement, Eko's lawyer Neel Chatterjee declared that they will persistently pursue their rights to prevent Quibi from worsening the damage caused.

"Eko has given Quibi fair warning that it cannot shutter its business, slather investors with hundreds of millions, and sell its stolen technology to third parties without resolving the issues with Eko first," Chatterjee said.

Rumors swirl that Quibi is now focused on returning the capital to its investors, with founders Jeffrey Katzenberg and CEO Meg Whitman potentially losing millions. Neither Quibi nor Eko has responded to requests for comments.

Quibi's founders have attributed the failure of the service to two primary reasons—the idea's insufficient strength as a standalone streaming service or unfavorable timing. However, they plan to utilize coming months to find buyers for these "valuable assets," hoping they can maximize their potential.

Quibi confirmed that the service will wind down "on or about Dec. 1, 2020," yet Eko seems willing to prolong a petty legal battle over technology that had limited appeal. In essence, it appears that Quibi's legal battle with Eko is unlikely to fizzle out any time soon.

1. The legal trouble between Quibi and Eko, revolving around the Turnstyle technology, seems evidently unaffected by Quibi's demise.
2. Neel Chatterjee, Eko's lawyer, stated that they will relentlessly pursue their rights to prevent Quibi from further damaging the technology they accuse it of stealing.
3. Despite Quibi's focus on returning capital to investors and potentially selling "valuable assets," it appears that the legal battle with Eko, centered on the tech at the heart of Quibi's concept, is inevitable.
4. It seems that the future of Quibi's legal battle with Eko, over a proprietary technology with limited appeal, is far from resolved, despite the downfall of the streaming service.

Read also: